NyMTiT – Nyugat-Mecseki Társadalmi Információs Ellenőrzési és Településfejlesztési Önkormányzati Társulás
ITET – Izotóp Tájékoztató Ellenőrző Társulás
TEIT – Társadalmi Ellenőrző, Információs és Településfejlesztési Társulás
TETT – Társadalmi Ellenőrző Tájékoztató Társulás
ANPPT [+ info] – Association of nuclear power plant’s territories
ANPPT | RUSSIA
The Fund for development of municipal entities “Association of nuclear power plant’s territories” (fund “ANPPT”) was established in 2013 at the initiative of Rosenergoatom. The founding partners are Rosenergoatom and local authorities of municipal entities where the NPPs are located. At present the fund “ANPPT” embraces 15 municipal entities and 12 operational NPP units and those under construction in Russia.
In 2018, a new composition of the Fund Council and auditing commission was approved and a new chairman was elected – Nikolay Nikolayevich Netyaga, head of the Novovoronezh urban district, Voronezh Oblast. Six meetings of the fund “ANPPT” Council were held in 2018.
The purpose of the Fund include:
- The organization of a “single window system” for information acquisition about nuclear energy facilities safety operation in all territories
- Coordination in making an implementing decisions of Rosenergoatom and local self-government bodies
- Creating a unified training system, sharing experience, competency building
- Developing common social safety standards
The Youth Council of the fund “ANPPT” including representatives of all NPP location areas was created in November 2018 with a view to develop youth initiatives.
The Fund pays special attention to developing international civil diplomacy. The Expert Council of the fund “ANPPT” including representatives of Hungary, Belarus and Abkhazia was created in 2018. Memoranda of twin-city relations were signed between Volgodonsk (Rostov Oblast) and Tamashi (Hungary), Polyarnye Zori (Murmansk Oblast) and Dukovany (Czech Republic).
AMAC – Asociación de Municipios en Áreas de Centrales Nucleares
KSO [+ info] – Association of Swedish Municipalities with Nuclear Facilities
KSO | SWEDEN
This text was provided by Ted Linquist on May 14 th 2020.
Background on KSO
In the 1970s there was a rapid expansion of nuclear power in Sweden and especially in the municipalities of Oskarshamn and Östhammar on the east coast and Kävlinge and Varberg on the west coast. The affected municipalities had to consider the huge construction works at the NPPs not only in their physical planning but also in their economic and social policies (housing, roads, social infra-structure, etc). After proposals from different politicians in the municipalities, a meeting took place in Malmö in the autumn of 1977. At that meeting between the “nuclear communes”, the mayors decided to create a special network, abbreviated KSO. In 1993, Nyköping entered KSO as a member with its important research and development centre at Studsvik.
This rather informal network with five members has been working for the last 40 years. The most important objective of KSO has been to facilitate the cooperation and the exchange of local experiences between the nuclear power municipalities. At meetings (2-3 times a year), seminars, study tours and training, a number of questions have been raised and discussed. Other major task for KSO is nuclear safety issues and competence building for nuclear staff. The waste management operations and plans, especially the siting of a high level waste (HLW) final repository is of great interest to follow for the members of KSO. Especially, Environmental Impact Studies in an early phase of planned changes are of a great interest to the affected municipalities as a base for an efficient local democratic dialogue. The more the municipalities can cooperate both nationally and internationally, the greater the possibility to be listened to and to be considered. The emergency planning and its impacts in the surroundings of the NPPs is another subject of interest to learn more about and to develop.
Since the foundation of KSO, the association has organised training for local politicians, especially designed for members of the Local Liaison/Safety Committees. KSO’s experiences of educating local politicians since more than 40 years demonstrate clearly the importance for them to understand the basic knowledge of the nuclear fuel cycle and especially why, what and how man must be protected from radiation. This includes the importance of taking relevant local decisions after a well-developed dialogue with the affected municipality and its citizens. In Sweden there is also a planning monopoly for local authorities so the municipalities have the possibility to change plans. There is also a possibility for a local veto when it comes to the question of hosting a facility.
Many study trips have been carried out abroad and sometimes to international organisations like IAEA and European institutions. These study tours are coordinated with the training of local politicians close to the NPPs. As said earlier a very important task to the network of KSO is to observe the nuclear world surrounding us. As a result of these observations KSO now and then makes conclusions and organises cooperation and sometimes lobbying for our sake versus the industry and versus the national Government as well as important decision makers and organisations like EU, NEA and IAEA.
Nuclear highlights Sweden
This text was provided by Ted Linquist on May 14 th 2020.
Swedish energy politics
In Sweden there is since 2016 an agreement between a majority of political parties in the Swedish Parliament regarding energy. The goal is 100 % renewables by 2045. Nuclear is still an option at existing nuclear sites during the life time of the reactors. There is also a possibility to build new reactors on existing sites/places.
At the same time there is a political discussion at the moment between different parties due to the fact that industry has decided to close down and dismantle in total 4 Swedish reactors. The reactors are located in Oskarshamn (Oskarshamn NPP) and Varberg (Ringhals NPP) municipalities. Both municipalities are members of KSO. Sweden will then have ten reactors in production. This has great impact on these two municipalities and the regions. A special conversion program including national grants has therefore been initiated.
The political parties opposing closure think that the 4 reactors should continue to produce electricity during the lifespan of the reactors. They are also in favour of building new reactors. They demand the National Agreement to be revised and a new Commission to be appointed.
The position of the national government, consisting of Socialdemocrats and the Greens, is that the Energy Agreement still is valid and do not want a new Commission.
Nuclear Power in Sweden
Nuclear power accounts for about 50 % of the electricity generated in Sweden.
In Sweden, there will be in the future 6 power-producing reactors at three sites: Forsmark (3), Oskarshamn (1) and Ringhals (2). Four of these are boiling water reactors while the Ringhals’s reactors are of the pressurised water reactor type.
Nuclear activities in Sweden are mainly regulated by the Act on Nuclear Activities. Under Swedish law, the responsibility for safety rests entirely with the holder of the licence to operate a nuclear facility.
The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) stipulates, in its regulations, what this responsibility entails and, through inspections and reviews, ensures that each licensee takes its responsibility. SSM also supervises compliance with the radiation protection regulations.
Deviations from normal operating procedures must be reported to SSM. Often, these involve technical problems that are of little significance to safety. In some cases, the authority intervenes and requires more extensive investigations or descriptions of the event. SSM can also shut down a reactor if it does not fulfil the requirements of the operating licence and regulations. Severe incidents are very uncommon in Sweden and radioactive releases that exceed the limits have so far not occurred.
The Swedish emergency preparedness organisation for nuclear accidents involves several authorities. In the event of an accident or a severe incident at a Swedish or foreign nuclear power plant which may entail consequences to the environment in Sweden, the Swedish emergency preparedness organisation will take effect. Sweden has signed agreements with several neighbouring countries whereby, at an early stage, these countries are to inform each other in the event of severe nuclear events.
Nuclear Waste Management
In Sweden there has been a long process of more than 25 years regarding radioactive waste management and the process of siting the national final geological repository. The concerned municipalities have been partners in the process all these years. There is a lot of competence in these issues at local level both on political level, municipal officials and civil servants and different stakeholders as for example the inhabitants. Recognition from both national government and industry for the municipalities contribution to solve a question of national interest is of great importance.
In 2018, KSO sent a letter to Parliament, Government and regulatory authorities pointing out the importance of this long process for over 25 years and that this should not be prolonged. KSO highlighted the importance that the government takes a decision regarding the HLW repository in the near future.
As of June 2020, Sweden awaits a final decision from the national government about the site for a final repository. Industry proposed Forsmark in Östhammar municipality HLW. After the ending of a judicial and environmental act process there is now hope that a Government decision is possible at the end of 2020.
NuLeAF – Nuclear Legacy Advisory Forum
Nuclear highlights UK
NuLeAF – Nuclear Legacy Advisory Forum
This text was provided by Ms. Catherine Drapper and Mr. Philip Matthews in August 2020.
WHO IS NuLeAF?
Founded in 2002, NuLeAF (the Nuclear Legacy Advisory Forum) is the Local Government Association (LGA) representative body on legacy wastes and decommissioning. Today, we are supported by over 100 local authorities and national park authorities across England and Wales and speak for the wider LGA on radioactive waste management issues. Our remit encompasses all aspects of the management of the UK’s nuclear waste legacy. Our aim is: That policy, strategy and practice for all nuclear waste and legacy issues has the interests of local authorities as a central concern, leading to the best possible outcomes for the communities they serve.
NuLeAF acts as the voice of our members, engaging on their behalf with the UK and Welsh Governments, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and regulators. We also work to build the capacity of local authorities to work together with government and industry to deliver the best outcomes for their area.
In addition to our work in the UK we are engaged in a range of European and international initiatives through the EU, NEA and IAEA.
Policy and Strategy
NuLeAF wants the Strategy and Policy framework for nuclear decommissioning and legacy waste management to be clear, effective, and operating in the interests of the communities that host nuclear licensed sites.
Site decommissioning and remediation
We want to see the effective and timely clean-up of nuclear legacy sites. Crucial issues for local government include the establishment of an effective framework for decommissioning and the development of clear plans for remediation of NDA sites and for their next planned use.
Geological Disposal Facility (GDF)
The search for a host community for the UK’s Higher Activity Waste (HAW) was launched in England in December 2018 and in Wales in January 2019. Local authorities are at the heart of the siting process and NuLeAF is working closely with the Government and RWM Ltd to:
- Raise awareness of the GDF siting process and thus increase the number of local communities entering;
- Ensure the process is workable and helps keep communities engaged in it for as long as they wish to be;
- Maximise the direct and indirect financial benefits for communities and local authorities;and
- Enhance the wider gains in terms of local economic development, skills, infrastructure and environmental outcomes.
Socio economics and skills
NuLeAF wants to boost the employment and economic outcomes of decommissioning and support local businesses and the supply chain. We continue to press the industry to support local Small/Medium Enterprises (SMEs), boost education and skills and deliver enhanced community benefits and investment.
Land Use & Waste Planning
NuLeAF’s Radioactive Waste Planning Group (RWPG) is an expert group of land use and waste planning officers that meets regularly. Through the RWPG we help advise government and the industry on planning issues and ensure that local plans are effective in delivering the right solutions for decommissioning.
The 2004 Energy Act gives the NDA a duty to engage with communities. We believe effective engagement is not just the right thing to do, but that it leads to better strategy, policy and practice to the benefit of all.
UK ENERGY POLICY
Current policy is for a diverse mix of energy sources that deliver the UK’s ambitions to achieve net zero carbon by 2050 while ensuring affordability and reliability of supply.
Recent years has seen a dramatic fall in the use of coal which now contributes just 3% of electricity generation. Renewables and natural gas both make deliver almost 40% of generation with nuclear contributing around 17% of the total. The UK also has a range in measures in place to help decarbonise the transport and heat sectors.
NUCLEAR POWER IN THE UK
The United Kingdom was a pioneer of nuclear technologies and the world’s first commercial nuclear power station was opened at Calder Hall near Sellafield in Cumbria in 1956. The Sellafield site, along with 10 Magnox Reactor sites and 2 research sites are now being decommissioned and remediated. There are currently 7 Advance Gas-cooled Reactors (AGRs) and 1 Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR) in operation in the UK. EDF is constructing new twin reactors at Hinkley Point in Somerset and has submitted a development consent order for further twin reactors at Sizewell in Suffolk. Other new large reactor projects have stalled, but Government is currently considering the potential of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) for some locations.
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
The UK has one of the largest and most complex decommissioning and nuclear waste management programmes in the world, with a particular challenge being the clean-up of the legacy ponds and silos at Sellafield. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) was created under the Energy Act 2004 to lead the remediation of former nuclear sites on behalf of the UK Government. They are responsible for decommissioning 17 nuclear sites, plus associated liabilities and assets. This includes the Magnox power stations, various research and fuel facilities and Sellafield, home to Calder Hall reactor, spent fuel reprocessing plant and storage, the UK stockpile of plutonium and other radioactive waste management facilities.
NDA produces a strategy which is updated every five years. Their plans are approved by the Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy and Scottish Ministers, who also provide a policy framework. Their work is overseen by the UK regulators.
NDA established Site Stakeholder Groups at each of its sites as a conduit to engage with the local community.
RWM Ltd, a subsidiary of NDA, is the developer for a geological disposal facility for Higher Activity Wastes.